Physician versus non-physician delivery of alcohol screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment in adult primary care: the ADVISe cluster randomized controlled implementation trial

Table 2 “Unhealthy drinkers” who received brief interventions or referral to treatment (BI/RT) by treatment arm

	PCP			NPP & MA			Control			p values²
	N screened positive	N received BI/RT	%	N screened positive	N received BI/RT	%	N screened positive	N received BI/RT	%	p values²
Medical center
1	90	51	56.67	1916	47	2.45	185	1	0.54	b, c
2	129	16	12.40	1849	24	1.30	41	1	2.44	b’’’, c
3	51	8	15.69	123	5	4.07	216	3	1.39	b’, c’’
4	241	141	58.51	1829	96	5.25	6	0	0.00	b’’, c
5	145	17	11.72	229	23	10.04	142	3	2.11	a’, b’’
6	246	120	48.78	2114	69	3.26	19	1	5.26	b’, c
7	394	200	50.76	172	9	5.23	26	0	0.00	b, c
8	503	153	30.42	1776	47	2.65	137	9	6.57	a’’, b, c
9	306	15	4.90	54	16	29.63	9	0	0.00	a’’’, c
10	697	545	78.19	4260	140	3.29	175	7	4.00	b, c
11	306	115	37.58	1259	55	4.37	176	5	2.84	b, c
All	3108	1381	44.43	15581	531	3.41	1132	30	2.65	b, c

¹Chi-square tests were used to compare the proportions of patients screened between each of the two intervention arms vs. control as well as between the two intervention arms
²a: p<0.0001, NPP & MA vs. Control. a’ p<0.01, NPP & MA vs. Control. a’’: p<0.05, NPP & MA vs. Control. a’’’: p<0.10, NPP & MA vs. Control. b: p<0.0001, PCP vs. Control. b’: p<0.001, PCP vs. Control. b’’: p<0.01, PCP vs. Control. b’’’: p<0.10, PCP vs. Control. c: p<0.0001, NPP & MA vs. PCP. c’: p<0.01, NPP & MA vs. PCP. c’’: p<0.05, NPP & MA vs. PCP

ISSN: 1940-0640