Skip to main content

Table 3 Percentage of participants that endorsed advice for the total sample and group comparisons

From: Insights from individuals successfully recovered from cannabis use disorder: natural versus treatment-assisted recoveries and abstinent versus moderation outcomes

Category (%)

Total sample (N = 119)

Recovery use status

Recovery pathway

AB (n = 68)

MOD (n = 51)

χ2

TAR (n = 53)

NR (n = 66)

χ2

Seek help/social support

37.8

47.1

25.5

5.8*

64.2

16.7

28.2***

Reflect on reasons for change

26.1

22.1

31.4

1.3

17.0

33.3

4.1*

Engage in hobbies/distracting activities

25.2

23.5

27.5

0.2

15.1

33.3

5.2*

Stimulus control/avoidance/change social environment

21.8

19.1

25.5

0.7

13.2

28.8

4.2*

Think positively

14.3

14.7

13.7

0.0

9.4

18.2

1.8

Face denial/self-deception

13.4

16.2

9.8

1.0

13.2

13.6

0.0

Change is a personal decision

11.8

13.2

9.8

0.3

7.5

15.2

ns i

Find underlying issue/motive for use

9.2

8.8

9.8

ns i

13.2

6.1

ns i

Quit

7.6

10.3

3.9

ns i

5.7

9.1

ns i

Research cannabis/addiction

5.0

4.4

5.9

ns i

5.7

4.5

ns i

Seek spiritual/religious guidance

5.0

7.4

2.0

ns i

3.8

6.1

ns i

Moderate use

2.5

4.4

0.0

ns i

3.8

1.5

ns i

Not sure/no answer

2.5

1.5

3.9

ns i

5.7

0.0

ns i

  1. Chi square values represent Pearson Chi square values. Absolute Chi square values are reported. AB abstinence; MOD moderation; NR natural recovery; TAR treatment-assisted recovery
  2. iFisher’s exact test was used instead of Pearson Chi square because expected cell counts were less than 5
  3. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001