Skip to main content

Table 3 Details from included studies examining opioid abstinence during MOUD

From: The impact of methamphetamine/amphetamine use on receipt and outcomes of medications for opioid use disorder: a systematic review

Author/year

Study design

Time period

Setting

Population

Adjunctive servicesa

Total N

Meth/amph measure

MOUD measure

Analysis

Covariatesb

Associationc

Direction (abstinence)

Liu 2018

Cross-sectional

Not reported

Taiwan; methadone tx programs in hospitals (various locations)

Adult patients receiving methadone for  ≥  3 months

344

Amph use (UDS)

Opioid use (UDS)

X2 test

None

20% in opioid group had amph use vs. 9% in no opioid group;

p  =  0.005

Negative

n  =  51

Hoang 2018

Longitudinal

2008–2013

Vietnam; methadone tx programs (national random sample)

Adult patients initiating methadone

500

Meth use prior to initiation (self-report)

Heroin use over 24-month f/u period (self-report and/or UDS)

Logistic regression

Family support, years used heroin, HIV status, antiretroviral therapy receipt

aOR: 2.68 (95% CI 1.08–6.65),

p  =  0.034

Negative

n  =  12

Kunøe 2010

Longitudinal (RCT data)

2005–2007

Norway; inpatient SUD tx programs and prisons (various locations)

Adults with OUD receiving sustained-release naltrex implants in RCT

60

Frequency of amph use during 6-month study period and final month (self-report; none, 1–3 times/month, 1–3 times/week, daily/almost daily)

Opioid use during tx (self-report)

Rank-test procedure (Spearman’s R)

Demographics

Opioid use group had more frequent amph use in 6-month period

(R  =  0.29; p  =  0.028)

and the final study month

(R  =  0.35; p  =  0.008)

Negative

(n not reported)

Proctor 2016

Longitudinal

2009–2011

US; inpatient SUD tx programs operated by large healthcare provider (various locations)

Adult patients receiving methadone with stay of  ≥  15 days

2410

Amph use at initiation, 3, 6, and 9 months (UDS)

Opioid use at 3, 6, 9, and 12-months (UDS)

Logistic regression

Demographics, dose

6-month amph use/9-month opioid use: aOR  =  5.77 (95% CI 1.26–26.40),

p  =  0.024; p  >  0.05 for all other time point combinations

Negative

n  =  219 at initiation (not reported for f/u timepoints)

Potter 2013

Longitudinal (RCT data)

2006–2009

US; federally-licensed OUD tx programs (various locations)

Adults with OUD initiating bup or methadone in RCT

705

Amph UD assessed at initiation (dx criteria)

Opioid abstinence (no use in 30 days before end of tx; self-report)

X2 test

None

6.6% in opioid group had amph use vs. 8.0% in no opioid group;

p  >  0.05

Non-significant

n  =  52

Senbanjo 2009

Cross-sectional

2003–2003

East Kent, England; methadone tx programs

Adults receiving methadone for  ≥  1 month

191

Amph use in past 14 days (self-report)

Heroin use in past 14 days (self-report)

X2 test; calculated unadjusted OR

None

X2

p  =  0.399; OR  =  2.07 (95% CI 0.37–11.6)

Non-significant

n = 6

Smyth 2018

Longitudinal

2000–2016

Dublin, Ireland; youth OUD tx program

Adolescent patients (<  18.5 years) initiating methadone or bup

Tx involved counseling, family therapy (in some cases)

39

Amph use in past month at initiation (self-report)

Heroin abstinence during 12th month of tx (UDS)

Fisher’s exact test; calculated unadjusted OR

None

Fisher’s exact

p  =  0.60; OR  =  0.3 (95% CI 0.03–3.1)

Non-significant

n  =  4

Abraham-sson 2016

Longitudinal

2011

Lund, Sweden; outpatient “interim” bup tx program

Adult patients with OUD initiating bup (on wait list for “full-scale” tx)

44

Days of amph use in past 30 days at initiation (self-report)

Opioid abstinence during entire study period (UDS)

Independent samples t test

None

Mean 0.6 days in opioid group; 1.2 days in no opioid group; t test p  >  0.1

Non-significant

n  =  13 reported any amph use

  1. amph amphetamine; aOR adjusted odds ratio; bup buprenorphine; CI confidence interval; dx diagnostic; f/u follow-up; meth methamphetamine; OUD opioid use disorder; RCT randomized controlled trial; SUD substance use disorder; tx treatment; UDS urine drug screen; US United States
  2. aIncluded if paper clearly described that study participants received or were offered services
  3. bA detailed description of covariates is provided in Appendix 2: Table 5
  4. cCrude measures of association are only presented alongside adjusted measures if there was a difference in statistical significance; p values and/or 95% CIs are presented when they were reported