Skip to main content

Table 2 Details from included studies examining retention in MOUD

From: The impact of methamphetamine/amphetamine use on receipt and outcomes of medications for opioid use disorder: a systematic review

Author/year

Study design

Time period

Setting

Population

Adjunctive servicesa

Total N

Meth/amph measure

MOUD measure

Analysis

Covariatesb

Associationc

Direction (retention)

Banta-Green 2009

Long-itudinal

2004–2005

Washington state, US; methadone tx programs

Adult patients initiating methadone

2308

Meth use “at time of intake” (self-report)

Retention at 1 year after initiation

Logistic regression

Demographics, social factors, physical health, other substance use, tx agency

aOR: 0.62 (95% CI 0.44–0.89),

p  =  0.009

Negative

n  =  164

Deck 2005

Long-itudinal

1994–1999

Oregon and Washington, US; publicly funded methadone tx programs

Medicaid eligible adults initiating methadone

OR: 3185

Amph use in past 30 days at initiation (self-report)

Retention at 1 year after initiation

Logistic regression

Demographics, social factors, other substance use, mental health, prior tx, referral source, distance from clinic, tx agency

Oregon: aOR  =  0.76 (95% CI 0.57–0.83)

Negative (Oregon only)

WA: 5103

Ns not presented for first episode only; 8% (Ore.), 5% (Wash.) of all tx episodes

Washington: aOR  =  1.01 (95% 0.70–1.45)

Hser 2014

Long-itudinal (RCT data)

2006–2009

US; federally-licensed OUD tx programs (various locations)

Adult patients initiating bup or methadone in RCT

Total: 1267

Amph use during 24-week f/u period (UDS)

Time to discontinuation

Cox PH model

Demographics, physical/mental health, other substance use, site, dose, MOUD type (in total sample)

Total sample: aHR = 4.87 (95% CI: 3.75–6.34)

Bup: aHR  =  4.50 (95% CI 3.32–6.10) Methadone: aHR  =  6.85 (95% CI 4.00–11.72),

Negative

Bup: 738

Ns at initiation

 Total sample n  =  114

Meth-adone: 529

 Bup n  =  64

(all p  <  0.01)

 Methadone n  =  50

Liu 2017

Long-itudinal

2013–2014

Guangzhou, China; methadone tx programs

Adult patients receiving methadone, with heroin use prior to tx

401

Meth use in past 6 months at baseline survey (self-report)

Time to discontinuation

Cox PH model

Marital status, # of times in “compulsory drug detoxification”

aHR  =  2.26 (95% CI 1.15–4.43),

p  =  0.017

Negative

n  =  31

Lo 2018

Long-itudinal

2005–2015

Vancouver, Canada; community survey

Adult PWUD reporting methadone tx in past 6 months

1301

At least daily meth use in past 6 months (self-report; repeated measure)

Reporting discontinuation in past 6 months (repeated measure)

GEE model with logit link

Demographics, social factors, other substance use, HIV, dose, % of visits on methadone

Crude OR  =  1.75 (95% CI 1.07–2.85),

p  =  0.025

aOR  =  1.02 (95% CI 0.61–1.69),

p  =  0.951

Negative (unadjusted only)

n  =  66 at baseline

Morgan 2018

Long-itudinal

2010–2014

US; national insurance claims data

Commercially insured individuals with OUD initiating bup or naltrex

38,190

Amph UD during study period (dx codes; abuse or dependence)

Time to discontinuation

Cox PH model

Demographics, other substance use, ever had detox, provider type, clinic setting, type of insurance, MOUD type

aHR 1.07 (95% CI 1.03–1.12),

p  =  0.002

Negative

n  =  2353

Peles 2008

Long-itudinal

Tel Aviv: 1993–2004

Las Vegas: 2000–2005

Tel Aviv, Israel and Las Vegas, Nevada, US; methadone tx programs

Adult patients initiating methadone

Individual therapy (both clinics): group therapy (required Tel Aviv; encouraged Las Vegas)

Tel Aviv: 492

Amph use at initiation (UDS)

Retention at 1 year after initiationd

Tel Aviv: Fisher’s exact test

Tel Aviv: none

Tel Aviv: Fisher’s exact

p  =  0.2

Negative (Las Vegas clinic only)

Las Vegas: 302

Tel Aviv: n  =  45

Las Vegas: logistic regression

Las Vegas: demographics, duration of opioid use, Hepatitis C

Las Vegas: aOR for NO amph use  =  2.1 (95% CI 1.05–4.2)

Las Vegas: n  =  47

Skeie 2013

Long-itudinal

1998–2007

Hedmark county/Oppland county, Norway; public OUD tx program

Adult patients receiving bup or methadone

131

Years of amph dependence during lifetime (structured interview)

Interruption of tx (planned or unplanned) during study period

Independent samples t test

None

Mean 9.2 years in interrupter group; 5.5 years in other group; t test

p  =  0.048

Negative

n not reported

Tsui 2020

Long-itudinal

2015–2018

Washington state, US; primary care bup tx program in urban hospital; rural telemedicine bup tx program

Adult patients initiating bup

768

Meth use in past 30 days at initiation (self-report; any vs. none and # of days)

Time to discontinuation

Cox PH models (ref group: no meth use)

Demographics, clinic site, time period of enrollment

Any use aHR: 2.39 (95% CI 1.94–2.93)

1–10 days aHR: 2.05 (95% CI 1.63–2.57)

11–20 days aHR: 3.04 (95% CI 2.12–4.23)

21–30 days aHR: 3.61 (95% CI 2.40–5.23)

Negative

n  =  237 (any use)

Schiff 2007

Long-itudinal

2004–2005

Israel; methadone tx programs (various locations)

Adult patients receiving methadone

2664

Amph use during tx (UDS)

100% retention during 13-month study period

Logistic regression

Demographics, other substance use

aOR  =  1.48 (95% CI 1.08-2.02),

p  =  0.015

Positive

(n not reported)

Hui 2017

Long-itudinal

2002–2014

Boston, MA, US; primary care bup tx in large safety-net medical center

Adult patients initiating bup

Behavioral health counseling required

1127

Amph use in first month of tx (UDS)

Discontinuation within 30 days after initiation

X2 test

None

4.8% of those who left vs. 3.2% who did not had amph use;

p  =  0.48

Non-significant

n  =  37

Kumar 2016

Long-itudinal

2012–2015

Little Rock, AR, US; outpatient bup tx program in university medical center SUD tx clinic

Adult patients initiating bup

Relapse prevention groups and individual CBT required

113

Amph use at initiation (UDS)

Discontinuation within 90 days after initiation

Logistic regression

Demographics, other substance use, pain, physical or emotional neglect (2 models)

Adj. for physical neglect: aOR  =  5.37 (95% CI 0.60–48.34); adj. for emotional neglect: aOR  =  4.53 (95% CI 0.50–41.01)

Non-significant

n  =  13

Logan 2019

Long-itudinal

2016–2018

Hawaii Island, Hawaii, US; rural FQHC primary care bup tx program

Patients initiating bup

Individual therapy and mutual support groups required

54

Meth UD assessed at initiation (dx criteria)

Retention at 3 months after initiation

X2 test

None

No significant association (test statistic/p value not reported)

Non-significant

n  =  24

Schuman-Olivier 2014

Long-itudinal

2007–2010

Boston, MA, US; outpatient bup tx program in academic community healthcare system

Adult patients initiating bup

Psycho-social tx (group or individual), relapse prevention group required

294

Amph use at initiation (UDS)

Retention at 3 months and 12 months after initiation

Logistic regression

None

3-month: OR  =  1.31 (95% CI 0.42–4.09),

p  =  0.647

Non-significant

n  =  18

12-month: OR  =  2.10 (95% CI 0.80–5.49),

p  =  0.130

Peles 2015

Long-itudinal

Tel Aviv: 1993–2013

Tel Aviv, Israel and Las Vegas, Nevada, US; methadone tx programs

Adult patients initiating methadone

Individual therapy (both clinics): group therapy (required Tel Aviv; encouraged Las Vegas)

Tel Aviv: 306

Amph use during tx (UDS)

Retention at 6 months after initiation

Fisher’s exact test

None

No significant association (test statistic/p value not reported)

Non-significant

Las Vegas: 2000–2014

Las Vegas: 190

Tel Aviv n  =  6

Las Vegas n  =  12

Pettes 2010

Long-itudinal

2005–2008

Vancouver, Canada; community survey

Adult PWID with HIV reporting methadone tx

248

“Frequent” meth use in past 6 months (self-report; repeated measure)

Time to discontinuation (reported having discontinued during past 6 months)

Cox PH model

None

No significant association (measure/p value not reported)

Non-significant

n  =  12 at baseline

Proctor 2015

Long-itudinal

2009–2011

US; methadone tx programs operated by a large health care provider (various locations)

Adult patients initiating methadone

1644

Amph use at initiation and 6 month f/u (UDS)

Discontinuation before 6 months and before 1 year after initiation

Logistic regression

Demographics, social factors, dose

6-months: aOR  =  1.57 (95% CI 0.92–2.69) for intake amph

Non-significant

n  =  178 at initiation; 41 at 6 months

12-months: aOR  =  1.61 (95% CI 0.50–5.24) for intake amph; aOR  =  2.91 (0.84–10.12) for 6-month amph

Smyth 2018

Long-itudinal

2000–2016

Dublin, Ireland; youth OUD tx program

Adolescent patients (<  18.5 years) initiating methadone or bup

Tx involved counseling, family therapy (in some cases)

120

Amph use in past month at initiation (self-report)

Retention until month 12 after initiation

Fisher’s exact test; Calculated crude OR

None

Fisher’s exact test p  =  0.45; OR  =  1.9 (95% CI 0.5–7.7)

Non-significant

n  =  9

Manhapra 2017

Long-itudinal

2011–2015

US; national VA

VA patients with OUD who initiated bup in FY 2012

3151

Amph UD during FY 2012 (dx codes, abuse/dependence)

Duration of tx (categorical) based on rx fills

Calculated RRs (ref group: 0–30 days)

None

31–365 days: RR  =  1.51

1–3 years: RR  =  1.31

> 3 years: RR  =  1.10

No statistical test reported

n  =  199

Manhapra 2018

Long-itudinal

2010–2014

US; national insurance claims data

Commercially-insured adults with OUD who initiated bup in FY 2011

16,190

Amph UD during FY 2011 (dx codes, abuse or dependence)

Duration of tx (categorical) based on rx fills

Calculated RRs (ref group: 0–30 days)

None

31–365 days: RR  =  0.9

1–3 years: RR  =  0.7

> 3 years: RR  =  0.2

No statistical test reported

n  =  106

White 2014

Long-itudinal

2011–2013

Washington, DC, US; private non-profit methadone tx program

Adult patients receiving methadone

Counseling group required; 12-step/mutual aid groups encouraged

604

Amph use during Aug 1-Nov 1, 2011 (UDS)

Discontinuation before Jan 2013

Compared %s across groups

None

3% of those who discontinued vs. 0.8% of those who did not had amph use

No statistical test reported

n  =  7

  1. aHR adjusted hazard ratio; amph amphetamine; aOR adjusted odds ratio; bup buprenorphine; CBT cognitive behavioral therapy; CI confidence interval; dx diagnostic; FQHC federally qualified health center; f/u follow-up; FY fiscal year; GEE generalized estimating equation; KM Kaplan–Meier; naltrex naltrexone; meth methamphetamine; MOUD medications for opioid use disorder; OR odds ratio; OUD opioid use disorder; PH proportional hazards; PWID people who inject drugs; PWUD people who use drugs; RCT randomized controlled trial; ref reference; RR risk ratio; rx prescription; SUD substance use disorder; tx treatment; UD use disorder; UDS urine drug screen; US United States; VA Veterans Health Administration
  2. aIncluded if paper clearly described that study participants received or were offered services
  3. bA detailed description of covariates is provided in Appendix 2: Table 5
  4. cCrude measures of association are only presented alongside adjusted measures if there was a difference in statistical significance; p values and/or 95% CIs are presented when they were reported
  5. dStudy also examined cumulative retention, however we were unable to interpret these results based on the description of these analyses