Skip to main content

Table 4 Risk of bias assessment summary ratingsa

From: The impact of methamphetamine/amphetamine use on receipt and outcomes of medications for opioid use disorder: a systematic review

Author/pub year

Participation

Attritionb

Prognostic factor measurement

Outcome measurement

Confounding

Statistical analysis and reporting

Abrahamsson 2016

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

High

Moderate

Banta-Green 2009

Low

N/A

Low

Low

Low

Low

Daniulaityte 2020

Low

N/A

Low

Low

Low

Low

Deck 2004

Low

N/A

Low

Low

Low

Low

Deck 2005

Low

N/A

Low

Low

Low

Low

Fairbairn 2012

Moderate

N/A

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Gjersing 2013

Low

N/A

Low

Low

High

Low

Hall 2016

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

High

Low

Hoang 2018

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

High

Moderate

Hser 2014

Low

N/A

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Hui 2017

Low

N/A

Low

Low

High

Moderate

Jones 2020

Low

N/A

Low

Low

Low

Low

Kumar 2016

Low

N/A

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Kunøe 2010

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Liu 2017

Low

Low

Low

Low

High

Moderate

Liu 2018

Moderate

N/A

Low

Low

High

Low

Lo 2018

Low

N/A

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Logan 2019

Low

N/A

Moderate

Low

High

Moderate

Manhapra 2017

Low

N/A

Moderate

Moderate

High

Moderate

Manhapra 2018

Low

N/A

Moderate

Moderate

High

Moderate

Manhapra 2020

Low

N/A

Moderate

Moderate

High

Moderate

Michel 2017

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Low

High

Moderate

Morgan 2018

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Peles 2008

Low

N/A

Low

Low

High

Moderate

Peles 2015

Moderate

N/A

Low

Low

High

Moderate

Pettes 2010

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Low

High

Moderate

Potter 2013

Low

High

Low

Low

High

Moderate

Proctor 2015

Low

N/A

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Proctor 2016

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Rhee 2019

Low

N/A

Moderate

Low

High

Moderate

Schiff 2007

Low

N/A

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Schuman-Olivier 2014

Moderate

N/A

Low

Low

High

Moderate

Senbanjo 2009

Moderate

N/A

Low

Low

High

Low

Shiner 2017

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Skeie 2013

Moderate

N/A

Moderate

Low

High

Low

Smyth 2018

Low

High

Moderate

Low

High

Moderate

Thirion 2001

Low

N/A

Low

Moderate

High

Moderate

Tsui 2020

Low

N/A

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

White 2014

Low

N/A

Low

Low

High

Low

  1. aBased on QUIPS risk of bias assessment instrument for prognostic factor studies; Hayden et al. [85]
  2. bAttrition domain was considered not applicable for cross-sectional studies and studies only examining retention/discontinuation as outcome of interest