Skip to main content

Table 2 Service providers’ ideas for improving youth opioid use services/treatments by overarching needs theme

From: “The system always undermined what I was trying to do as an individual”: identifying opportunities to improve the delivery of opioid use services for youth from the perspective of service providers in four communities across British Columbia, Canada

Ideas themesa

Community

Select representative idea(s)b

Need theme: respond to youth in a timely and appropriate manner (n = 79)

 1. Expand service locations throughout communities and outreach-based services (n = 13)

All communities

“Multiple hubs throughout the community where kids can access most types of treatment”

 2. Engage youth in service planning and monitoring (n = 12)

All communities

“Ask youth what services they would like to see”

 3. Programs that create or maintain positive relationships in youths’ lives (n = 11)

Victoria

“Allow friends to go to treatment together”

 4. Create programs that incorporate recreational activities for youth (n = 10)

Victoria

“Groups for youth using opioids that will take them to do different activities and help them discover a hobby or passion”

 5. Integrate diverse staff and experiences into service delivery (n = 10)

Victoria

“Value lived experience”

“Provide accessibility and accommodations for staff”

 6. Create programs that develop or maintain cultural connection (n = 9)

Victoria

“Connection to land”

“Cross cultural services (not a one size fit)”

 7. Create programs and spaces that are specific to youth and diverse youth (n = 7)

Victoria; Vancouver

“Youth specific services whenever possible, e.g., ‘sobering centre’, OAT, stabilization, etc.”

“Identity-based groups within services, e.g., queerabilities”

 8. Develop interventions for youth using stimulants (n = 7)

Vancouver

“Move towards RCT for stimulant assisted treatment”

Need theme: improve intra-organizational supports and inter-organizational collaboration (n = 66)

 1. Inter-organizational activities (e.g., newsletters, social networking sites, tours) or events (e.g., conferences) to learn about what other agencies/providers offer (n = 39)

All communities

“Quarterly meeting for all youth services in Prince George—a big conference”

“Weekly newsletter via email that discusses different services”

 2. Activities to build up service provider competencies (n = 17)

All communities

“Gather collective wisdom through community of practice”

 3. Procedures that enable inter-organizational collaboration (n = 10)

All communities

“Build reciprocal and positive relationships with other organizations”

Need theme: system-level innovation (n = 64)

 1. Develop infrastructure to increase local service/treatment capacity (n = 30)

Victoria; Vancouver

“Designate a number of units in buildings as affordable youth units”

“Fund grassroots community initiatives”

 2. Create clearer pathways into and between services/treatments (n = 14)

Victoria; Vancouver

“One information source for treatment information and referrals”

“Different levels of treatment in one place, e.g., day program, residential, counseling, groups”

 3. Reduce unnecessary system-related barriers to access services/treatments (n = 14)

Prince George; Victoria

“Shared consent forms for continuity of care”

“Simple universal referral forms with minimal information required”

 4. Develop youth-specific standards (n = 6)

Vancouver

“Develop indicators of success from a social lens and beyond urine drug screens and emergency department visits”

  1. aIdeas were brainstormed by individual participants in the workshops and documented on flip charts. The overarching need themes (Fig. 1) were used to sort individual ideas from across all four communities. Individual ideas were then studied and thematically analysed following an inductive approach. Data shown reflect the semantic ideas themes, which represent clusters of individual ideas that were similar across participants and communities. Data in the brackets represent the number of individual ideas that were collated into the idea theme, thus a higher number represents a higher number of individual ideas coded in the respective ideas theme
  2. bData shown are representative examples of individual ideas that were coded within the semantic ideas themes