Skip to main content

Table 3 Post-linkage outcomes

From: Three decades of research in substance use disorder treatment for syringe services program participants: a scoping review of the literature

First author and year, country (city)

Design

Sample description and N

Outcomes

Results

Havens 2009, USA, (Baltimore) [74]

Same RCT as Strathdee 2006

Intervention arm:

Strength based case management (SBCM)

Comparison arm: passive referral

RCT participants who successfully entered treatment (N = 127)

Predictors of retention in methadone treatment

Median duration in treatment was 7.9 months

(IQR = 6–12.2 months)

Adjusted HR for days retained in methadone: Treatment site ≥ 4.5 miles from home 2.15 (1.31–3.51); Lived in more than one place in last year 1.79 (1.10–2.92); Unemployed 0.37 (0.21–0.63); Previously enrolled in outpatient drug-free treatment 0.3 (0.13–0.71); Asked SSP twice or more for treatment slot 0.60 (0.36–0.97); Baseline ASI psychiatric score ≥ median score 2.22 (1.33–3.73)

Bråbäck 2017, Sweden (Malmo)[43]

Same RCT as Bråbäck 2016

Intervention arm:

CASE management plus referral

Comparison arm:

Referral alone

RCT participants who successfully enrolled in buprenorphine or methadone treatment (N = 71)

Treatment retention

3, 6 and 12 month retention: 94%, 89%, 82%

Kidorf 2018, USA (Baltimore) [42]

Intervention arms:

1) Low

Threshold methadone Initiation (LTI)

2) Voucher Reinforcement Initiation (VRI)

Comparison arm: Standard Care Initiation (SCI)

SSP participants newly initiating methadone treatment

(N = 212)

Treatment retention

3 month retention: (SCI: 31%; VRI: 34%; LTI: 35%, NS)

6 month retention: (SCI: 29%; VRI: 34%; LTI: 37%, NS)

Kidorf 2021, United States (Baltimore) [46]

Same RCT as Kidorf 2018

Intervention arms:

1) Low

Threshold methadone Initiation (LTI)

2) Voucher Reinforcement Initiation (VRI)

Comparison arm: Standard Care Initiation (SCI)

RCT participants (N = 210)

Sexual risk behaviors over 6 months after starting methadone treatment

Sexual risk scores (range 0–18) decreased by 0.354 one month after enrollment (p < 0.01), but not significantly thereafter (p = 0.321)

Kidorf 2021, United States (Baltimore) [45]

Same RCT as Kidorf 2018

Intervention arms:

1) Low

Threshold methadone Initiation (LTI)

2) Voucher Reinforcement Initiation (VRI)

Comparison arm: Standard Care Initiation (SCI)

RCT participants (N = 210)

Substance use risk behaviors over 6 months after starting methadone treatment

Drug risk scores (range: 0–22) decreased by 1.573 one month after enrollment (p < 0.01), with reductions of 0.129 per month thereafter (p < 0.01)

Kidorf 2011, United States (Baltimore) [75]

Same RCT as Kidorf 2009

Intervention arms:

1) Motivational referral condition (MRC)

2) MRC + financial incentives (MRC + I)

Comparison arm: Standard referral condition (SRC)

RCT participants who enrolled in methadone treatment vs. did not enroll

(N = 240)

Risk behaviors over 4 months

Participants who enrolled in treatment reported less days of opioid (p < 0.01) and cocaine (p < 0.01) use, IVDU (p < 0.01), illegal activities (p < 0.01) and incarceration (p < 0.05) after 4 months

Kuo 2003, United States (Baltimore) [76]

Cohort study

People with OUD enrolled in a single SSP for > 1 month who expressed interest in SUD treatment (N = 163)

(a) % enrolling in treatment (levomethadyl acetate hydrochloride (LAAM)), (b) treatment retention, and (c) early treatment response (UDT) and addiction severity index (ASI) scores

(a) 70% enrolled in LAAM

(b) 84% actively enrolled after 90 days, mean duration treatment 8.1 months

(c) 31.2% decrease in heroin positive (p < 0.01) and 22.5% decrease in cocaine positive (p = 0.01) UDT from month 1 to 3. ASI scores lower in drug (p < 0.01), alcohol (p < 0.01) and legal (p < 0.01) domain at 1 month

Brooner 1998, United States (Baltimore) [12]

Cohort study

Patients admitted to methadone treatment referred from SSP vs. standard referral sources (N = 325)

(a) Treatment retention & (b) substance use

(a) 76% of SSP referred vs. 88% of other completed 13 weeks of treatment (p > 0.01);

(b) SSP referred had more opioid positive (49% vs. 29% p < 0.01) and cocaine positive (54% vs. 32% p < 0.01) than standard referral sources during first 3 months of treatment

Neufeld 2008, United States (Baltimore) [47]

Same study as Brooner 1998

Cohort study, outcomes extended to 12 months

Patients admitted to methadone treatment referred from SSP vs. other referral sources (N = 324)

(a) Treatment retention at 12 months and (b) substance use (UDT)

(a) 35% SSP referrals vs. 56% other referral source completed 365 days of treatment (p < 0.05);

(b) SSP referred had negative UDTs for opioids (63% vs. 78%, p < 0.05), cocaine (57% vs. 75%, p < 0.05) and any drugs (45% vs. 62%, p < 0.05)

  1. SSP syringe services program, MOUD medication for opioid use disorder, OUD opioid use disorder, SUD substance use disorder, ASI addiction severity index, HR hazards ratio, UDT urine drug testing